GregHowley.com

CAMRAA Sucks

September 19, 2006 - - -

I spoke in my first Mungcast about the Children and Media Research and Advancement Act and why I thought it was a bad idea. Well, just this week, Senate passed the damned thing. Freaking Lieberman. Freaking Hillary Clinton. Those two make me ashamed to have been a resident of Connecticut and New York.

Video games are evilThis act will have the CDC performing a study on the effects of media on children. Personally, I believe that this study is going to be biased from the start, and that those conducting it have already come to a conclusion, and are simply going to conduct "research" to justify their foregone conclusion.

The only hopeful phrase in the article is the following:

According to a press release issued by Senator Santorum, "The CDC will then issue grants based on these priorities to researchers to examine the impact of media on children and adolescents' ability to learn and their social, emotional, physical, and behavioral development."

If they're checking on the impact video games has on childrens' ability to learn, they're likely to find that the games improve concentration and sharpen young minds, as I've often heard. I'm just worried about the rest: social (I'll bet they're testing single-player games) emotional (can only go horribly wrong in this kind of study) physical (They're not testing DDR or Wii games, so how can sitting in a chair have any physical benefit?) and behavioral (unlikely to go well).

If this goes how I feel it will, it will inevitably lead to government regulation over video game ratings, and underaged gaming will become like underaged drinking. Why can't we just decide that parents should make these decisions for their children? Personally, I'd rather parent my own child rather than have the government do it.

Comments on CAMRAA Sucks
 
Comment Tue, September 19 - 2:48 PM by TheGuru
 
Comment Tue, September 19 - 9:28 PM by pmd
Crikey, Spam Filter: "Your message has been interpreted as spam. If you've reaced this message in error, please email greg to tell him."

Let's play... OUTSMART THE FILTER!

Well, Ned Lamont's people just called me after 8pm. I can go off for a few paragraphs about telephone solicitors, but I won't. Let's just say I don't care for them and I don't care if it IS an election.

Let's see... The other choices are Lieberman, a guy who "cheats" at cards at the casino under a false name, and some other guy that isn't going to win.

Well, this breaks my "Leave me the hell alone" rule... but looks like I might vote for Lamont after all. Maybe.

...

 
Comment Tue, September 19 - 10:56 PM by Greg
Yep - you used the word "casino", and that's one of my banned words. (only I can write it) - But I just updated and fixed your comment (changed two characters) to how I imagine you meant it.

As long as it wasn't you who just posted about 8-10 spam comments that said only "johnny", I'm happy. ;) Who the heck posts this crap?
 
Comment Thu, September 21 - 2:01 AM by pmd
Could it be Johnny Johnny?