GregHowley.com

ISPs Yield to Copyright Terrorism

October 20, 2004 -

An article on Joi Ito's site reveals that for the most part, when presented with a claim of copyright infringement, ISPs will take down a site without even checking the validity of the claim.

A Dutch civil rights group recently ran an experiment in which they posted an 1871 public domain text to domains hosted by ten different ISPs, and then sent copyright infringement notices - full of legalese - to each on behalf of a fictitous organization which allegedly owned the copyright to the work. Despite the fact that the notice was sent via hotmail, seven of the ten removed the material. Some ISPs did this within hours, and some failed to so much as notify the account owner. Of the ISPs, only one actually noticed that the text in question was public domain. The rest likely did not so much as read it. One of the ISPs actually sent the hotmail claimant the site owner's personal information!

It is indeed sad news that in today's world the fear of being sued is great enough to usurp justice. I can only hope that these ISPs have learned from this, and that perhaps others in the world will take notice.

A full text of Bits Of Freedom's experiment can be found here.

Comments on ISPs Yield to Copyright Terrorism
 
Comment Wed, October 20 - 12:39 PM by tagger
My, my -- Imagine that. I'm really sorry to have to say that I'm not surprised. Fear of lawsuits seems to drive far too many business decisions these days.

One shouldn't have to be a practicing lawyer to run an ISP, IMO. While I'm sure most ISPs have some sort of in-house legal staff or someone outside on retainer, this looks to me like the result of a corporate policy that says something like, "Terminate any account you have reason to believe is violating any laws." In other words, vague enough so whoever sees the complaint can take the easy way out by simply pulling the plug. Whoever runs the ISP may feel it's easier and less costly to deal with an irate customer who has been cut off for no reason than to pay someone to investigate each and every accusation.

It would seem that this could join the growing list of instances where you're are guilty until proven innocent and just a simple accusation is enough to screw up your life. It kind of reminds me of the McCarthy era. I recall reading about some engineer who was fired from his job with a defense contractor because someone decided his wife had friends who *might* be communist supporters.

We live in a weird, sad world.