GregHowley.com

Remote Free TV

September 12, 2008 -

Linda and I watched our Tivoed copy of Fringe last night, which was actually a lot better than I'd expected. But what really impressed me though wasn't the show - it was the commercials.

Fringe was the flagship show for FOX's new remote-free TV format. When I first heard of this, I was glad to hear that they'd have fewer commercials, but couldn't imagine that we'd actually watch even a minute of commercials when the remote was already in hand.

But when the first commercial popped up, and I saw that it was for Spore, I immediately told Linda "wait!", because... she had the remote. Yes, I am ashamed.

Most of the other commercials were for movies. Quantum of Solace, Burn After Reading, Miracle at St. Anna, Eagle Eye, Body of Lies, Lakeview Terrace, and honestly, most of them look like pretty good movies. Except Max Payne. I saw Wahlberg, and our conversation went something like this:

Greg: Bad movie.
Linda: Why do you say that? It looks good.
Greg: It's based on a video game.
And yes, as I've said before, movies based on games all suck.

To be fair, we did fast-forward through the AT&T, Ford, and asthma meds commercials, as well as the local spots, which jarringly snapped to standard def 4:3 mode, but overall I'm amazed to say that in our house, remote-free TV was a success for FOX.

Now comes the question of why. Why we watched the commercials. It really wasn't because there were fewer. It was because they were movie trailers (and one video game ad I'd never seen before) that we were interested in seeing. I mean, sometimes I'll visit the quicktime trailers web page and just watch movie trailers - they're interesting. I can only expect that in the future, remote free tv will feature ads for insurance and deodorant. At that point, it'll be as big a failure as ads have ever been.

Comments on Remote Free TV
 
Comment Fri, September 12 - 1:20 PM by Frank
I really wasn't impressed by Fringe at all. It has potential, but I think they blew it in casting. Joshua Jackson will always look fifteen years old, no matter how much peach fuzz he tries to grow. I'm not buying him as tough soldier and frankly his character is annoying. His constant wisecracks grew old very quickly and they set up the relationship with his father very poorly. I think Dr. Bishop would cooperate with our without his son. Olivia is a fairly weak character as well, I'm hoping she'll develop quite a bit more as the season goes on.

The other main complaint I had was with J.J. Abrams insistence on leaving random and unexplained hints that you know will never be resolved. He did this so much with Lost that no one cares what the mysteries are anymore. I fear the rotating leafs and glimpses of hidden labs will just be left hanging with no meaning.

I'll give it a few more episodes and see if it improves, but it's definitely no X-Files at this point.
 
Comment Fri, September 12 - 1:28 PM by Greg
Obviously, they've got to go somewhere with certain elements in the show or else the whole thing will flop. But I'm attempting not to hold Lost against it. I think the casting was okay, and the crazy old scientist is awesome. I also thought the story had a really good twist (won't mention specifics in case anyone reading hasn't seen it)
 
Comment Tue, September 16 - 1:47 PM by Frank
I'll keep watching for Dr. Biship alone, plus he's played by John Noble of LoTR fame.
 
Comment Tue, September 16 - 7:45 PM by tagger
Three cheers for COFs (Crazy Old Farts). Some of my best friends . . .